The Watsons of Barkway

In my recent post about the origins of the Roe family, I reported on new information shared by my distant relative Keith Roe about Elizabeth Roe of Barkway, Hertfordshire. It seems likely that Elizabeth, who was born in the early 1790s, was related in some way to my 3rdgreat grandfather, Daniel Roe of Biggleswade, who died in 1838.

Elizabeth Roe was married twice. In 1815 she married James King and they had three children – Richard, Henry and Elizabeth – before James’ death. This must have occurred before 1837, when Elizabeth married for a second time, to widower Lot Watson. At the time of the 1841 census Lot and Elizabeth Watson can be found living in Barkway High Street, with Lot’s two sons, Thomas and John, from his first marriage, and Elizabeth’s daughter Elizabeth from her first marriage.

Screen Shot 2018-09-16 at 16.19.34

Lot and Elizabeth Watson in the 1841 census

After 1841, the story becomes rather more problematic. If we search for Lot Watson in the 1851 census, we find someone who matches his details, still living in Barkway High Street with his sons Thomas and John, and describing himself as a widower – suggesting that his wife Elizabeth had died at some point in the previous ten years. Ten years later, in 1861, now aged 50, Lot is still describing himself as a widower, and still living in Barkway with his son Thomas, now 27, and the latter’s wife, Maria (they had married in 1856).

Screen Shot 2018-09-16 at 16.20.18

‘Widower’ Lot Watson and his sons in the 1851 census

However, Keith Roe has found convincing evidence that Elizabeth Watson, formerly King, née Roe, was actually still alive in 1851, and living in Luton, in the same street as her daughter Elizabeth King, who had married shoemaker George Hale in 1846, the record stating clearly that she was the daughter of James King and was born in Barkway. In the census records for 1851 and 1861, the older Elizabeth can be found living close to her daughter’s family, and in 1871 actually living with her daughter. Moreover, in all of these census records, Elizabeth describes herself as a widow.

There seems little doubt that this is the same person who married first James King and then Lot Watson. In 1861, she gave her name as Elizabeth King, a widow aged 61, and was living alone in Park Lane, Luton, a few houses away from George and Elizabeth Hale and their family. Ten years later, Elizabeth King was still living in Park Lane, even closer to the expanding Hale family (though that may simply be a result of the order in which households were entered in the records). By the time of the 1871 census, Elizabeth Hale, née King, was herself a widow. Now aged 44, she was living in Elizabeth Street, Luton, with five of her children. Living with her was her mother, Elizabeth, who now gave her surname as Watson, and her age as 80.

Screen Shot 2018-09-16 at 16.22.36

‘Widow’ Elizabeth Watson in the 1871 census

In an effort to get to the heart of this mystery, I’ve been attempting to trace the history of the Watson family of Barkway, and the trajectory of Lot’s life. Another connection between the Watson and Roe families arises from the fact that, at the time of the 1851 census, my 3rdgreat grandmother Eliza Sharp, formerly Roe, née Holdsworth, was working as a nursery servant for the Walbey family, who were farmers in the village of Nuthampstead, a couple of miles to the east of Barkway. Working alongside her as domestic servants were 20-year-old Emma Watson and 16-year-old Mary Watson, both from Barkway. I believe that Emma and Mary were sisters, and that they were the daughters of farm labourer George Watson and his wife Mary. Ten years earlier, the 1841 census record finds George and Mary living in the village of Newsells, just to the north of Barkway, with their children Charles, Elizabeth, Emma, Mary, George and Mark. The 1841 census was notoriously inaccurate in recording ages, but cross-checking with later, more reliable census data confirms that Charles was born in about 1827, Emma in about 1831, Mary in about 1835, George in about 1838, and Mark in 1840.

barkway church flickr

Parish church of St Mary Magdalene, Barkway (Robert Camp, via

George Watson senior was almost certainly the son of William and Eleanor Watson – and therefore the brother of Lot Watson who married Elizabeth King, née Roe, the record of their marriage stating that Lot was the son of William Watson. William Watson and Eleanor Taylor had married in Barkway on 19thDecember 1799. On 23rd June 1822 they had four children christened together: George, Mercy, Thomas and Lot.  From other records, we can work out the approximate birth years of these children as follows: George, 1803; Mercy, 1803; Lot, 1811; Thomas, 1811. Mercy’s and Lot’s names suggest that the family might have been Nonconformists and this might explain the children’s delayed Church of England baptisms.

George Watson must have married his wife Mary by about 1826. His sister Mercy married labourer William James in Royston on 1stNovember 1827. In 1841 they were living in Barkway Street, Royston, with their five children, and were still there ten years later. Mercy’s brother Thomas Watson is almost certainly the person of that name, said to be the son of William Watson, who married Elizabeth Phypers in Barkway on 12thOctober 1839.

As for Lot Watson, he married for the first time on Christmas Eve, 1829, to Mary Hart, in Barkway. Lot and Mary Watson had two sons: Thomas was born in 1832 and John in 1835. Mary Watson must have died shortly after, perhaps as a result of John’s birth, since on 9th November 1837 we know that Lot married Elizabeth King, née Roe.

The 1841 census claims that Lot was 30 and Elizabeth 40 at the time, which would mean they were born in 1811 and 1801 respectively. However, ages in that year’s census records were notoriously inaccurate, and later records suggests that Lot might have been born as early as 1809, and Elizabeth as early as 1793. Whatever their precise dates of birth, the difference of at least ten years between their ages, and the fact that they had both been widowed and would have no children together, suggest that their marriage might have been one of social and economic convenience, Elizabeth acting as a substitute mother for Lot’s two young sons.

So how are we to explain that, thirteen years after their marriage, Lot and Elizabeth were not only living apart – but each claiming that the other had died? Not only that, but in 1869, Lot Watson would marry again, despite the fact that Elizabeth was apparently still alive.

Screen Shot 2018-09-16 at 16.23.57

The marriage of ‘widower’ Lot Watson and Ellen Spicer in 1869

On 26thDecember 1869, Lot Watson, a widower working as a bricklayer, married Ellen Spicer, a widow, at Holy Trinity church, Haverstock Hill, in London. The witnesses were Thomas and Maria Watson – presumably Lot’s son and daughter-in-law. One might be tempted to dismiss this record as relating to a different, London-born Lot Watson (even though he is said to be the son of William Watson), but the census taken two years later finds Lot and Ellen Watson living in the latter’s home village of Great Hormead, five miles to the south of Barkway, with a number of Ellen’s children. They were still there ten years later, at the time of the 1881 census.

By 1891, Lot Watson seems to have been widowed again, and, now aged 82 and a pauper, was living in the workhouse at Buntingford, five miles to the west of Great Hormead. He appears to have died seven years later in 1898.

Is there a possibility that the Lot Watson who married Elizabeth King, née Roe, and the widower who married Ellen Spicer were actually two different people? The 1841 census is our only record, after their marriage in 1837, of Lot and Elizabeth Watson being together. That record suggests Lot was born in about 1811 and worked as an agricultural labourer. He already had two sons – Thomas, 8 and John, 6 – which enables us to match him with the Lot Watson who was previously married to Mary Hart.

This information also enables us to match him to the Lot Watson to be found in Barkway High Street ten years later, in 1861, with his sons Thomas and John, now aged 18 and 16 respectively. There is  slight discrepancy in Lot’s age – he is said to be 42, which would mean he was born in 1809, whereas the 1841 census claimed he was born in 1811, but as already mentioned, we know that the 1841 census officials tended to round ages up or down. The record of Lot’s marriage to Ellen Spicer states that he was 51 in 1869, which would mean he was born in 1818. However, the fact that he was a bricklayer supports the argument that this was the same man. Not only that, but the 1871 census record for Lot and Ellen puts his age at 60, while the 1881 census has him as 72 and the 1891 record as 80. This suggests either that Lot himself was unsure of his own year of birth, or that he was rather economical with the truth when it came to revealing his age. (Something similar can be seen in the case of his erstwhile wife Elizabeth: in 1841 she was said to be 40, she was 61 in 1851, 68 in 1861, and 80 in 1871.)

Were there any other men named Lot Watson living in the Barkway area at this time? The only one I can find is the 70-year-old man who in 1841 was living in Barkway High Street with Elizabeth Watson, aged 20, and one-year-old Ann Watson. He is probably the same man who married Mary Webb in Barkway in 1800. They had a son named Charles, a blacksmith like his father, who married a woman named Ann Childs and died in 1856. This Lot Watson, who must have been born in about 1772, seems to have died in 1844, the burial record describing him as a Congregationalist.

Some family trees at Ancestry claim that it was the older Lot Watson who married Elizabeth King, née Roe, in 1837, that she is the Elizabeth Watson to be found living with him in 1841, and that Ann was their daughter. But this seems extremely unlikely, given the disparity in their ages – 70 and 20 – even allowing for census inaccuracies, and the fact that this Elizabeth would have been only 16 at the time of her marriage in 1837, when we know that she was already a widow. The other 1841, which includes 14-year-old Elizabeth King, her daughter from her first marriage, matches what we know of Elizabeth King, née Roe’s details much more closely.

Further research is needed to discover the origins of the older Lot Watson, and of the Elizabeth and Ann Watson living with him in 1841. My current theory is that he was a brother of the William Watson who was the father of ‘our’ Lot Watson, who may have been named after his uncle.

So if the Lot Watson who married Elizabeth King, née Roe, is the same man who later claimed to be a widower and then married Ellen Spicer, and if Elizabeth is the same woman who moved to Luton, all the time claiming to be a widow – how are we to explain this? We can only conclude that the couple separated after a few years of marriage, perhaps because they grew apart and divorce was not yet a legal possibility, or perhaps because, as already suggested, their marriage had only ever been one of convenience.

It’s not as if this story is unique in my family’s history. There are definite echoes of the story of Lot and Elizabeth Watson in the life of my 3rd great grandmother Eliza Sharp, formerly Roe, née Holdsworth. Following her second marriage to John Sharp in 1845, there is little evidence that the couple ever lived together. In 1851, John was living alone in Barkway High Street, while Eliza was living with and working for the Walbey family in Nuthampstead. I haven’t managed to find John Sharp in the 1861 census, but Eliza was again away from home, working for Rev. Robert Merry and his family in Guilden Morden, just across the county border in Cambridgeshire. She would still be with Rev. Merry’s widow and her family in Devon ten years later, though, she had now reverted to her previous married name of Roe (just as Elizabeth Watson reverted to her former surname of King in 1851 and 1861). This was despite the fact that her husband John Sharp was still alive and, in another echo of Lot Watson’s experience, was languishing in the workhouse in Bassingbourn.

As for Lot Watson’s apparent bigamy – marrying for a third time to Ellen Spicer while his wife Elizabeth was still alive – this is not unprecedented either. I’ve written elsewhere about my theory that my 3rd great aunt on my father’s side of the family, Elizabeth Robb, may have married a bigamist when she wed dentist Joseph Woolley Boden in 1841, and indeed that she may have later committed bigamy herself with piano teacher Edmund Vineer. Apparently these things were not uncommon at a time when divorce was next to impossible for those without means or social status. Perhaps the fact that Elizabeth had moved to Luton – thirty miles away in another county – made it easier for Lot to pass himself off as a widower (and she as a widow), while setting up home with his third wife Ellen in her home village of Great Hormead prevented them becoming the subject of gossip in his home town of Barkway.


The family origins of William Roe of Luton (b. 1811)

I wrote recently about new evidence connecting my Roe ancestors with the part of England where I now live. My distant relative Keith Roe has found a Roe family living in the village of Pirton, just a few miles from Hitchin where I’m writing this, who may have been related to my 3rdgreat grandfather Daniel Roe (d. 1838), a Baptist shoemaker in Biggleswade, ten miles further north. As I noted in my earlier post, I was particularly intrigued by Keith’s discovery of a shoemaker named John Roe who served his apprenticeship here in Hitchin in the 1780s, and was married in the town twice, firstly in 1788 and secondly in 1792. It’s almost certain that he is the same John Roe who was paying land tax on property in nearby Luton in the 1820s.

Luton in the 19th century

Whether this John Roe was related in some way to the Roes of Pirton is as yet unproven. However, we know that William and Martha Roe of Pirton had two sons, named John and Daniel, who were both still alive when Martha made her will in 1817. We don’t have records of the births or baptisms of these children, perhaps because the family were Dissenters. We also lack records for any children born to John Roe of Luton, possibly for the same reason.

However, we do know that there would be Roes living in Luton later in the 19thcentury. I’ve written before about William and Peter Roe, who may have been brothers, and whose families can be found in the census records for Luton from 1841 onwards. There are some circumstantial factors pointing to a link with both John Roe and the Roes of Pirton – William and Peter were both shoemakers; William could have been named after William Roe of Pirton (his grandfather?) and Peter after Peter Moss, the father of Martha Roe of Pirton (his great grandfather?); and we know that William of Luton named two of his sons John and Daniel.

I’ve now obtained a piece of evidence that may provide a more well-founded link between these later Roes in Luton and John Roe, the shoemaker who served his apprenticeship in Hitchin in the 1780s. Marriage certificates usually include the names of each party’s fathers, so they can be useful tools for tracing an individual’s family origins. Official registration of births, marriages and deaths only began in 1837, which means that for events before that date we have to rely on the parish registers. Peter Roe married his wife Dinah Scrivener in 1827, and William Roe his wife Sarah Huckle in 1831, so certificates aren’t available for those events. However, I remembered that William married his second wife, Elizabeth Maddocks, in 1852, so I applied to the General Register Office for the certificate. My copy arrived yesterday, and it clearly states that William Roe, a 41-year-old shoemaker and widower of Luton, was the son of John Roe, also a shoemaker.

Copy of the marriage certificate of William Roe and Elizabeth Maddocks, 7th June 1852 (via GRO)

Now, there might have been more than one John Roe working as a shoemaker in Luton in 1811 or thereabouts, when William Roe was born. But it’s certainly possible that William’s father was the man who served his apprenticeship in Hitchin in the 1780s. At the same time, my distant Australian relative Julie Campbell, who is descended from Richard John Roe, one of the sons of my 3rdgreat grandfather Daniel Roe of Biggleswade, tells me that she has learned of DNA matches with two people who have William Roe of Luton in their family trees.

Coats of arms in 16th and 17th century London

This is a guest post by John Lehman of the Coats of Arms Database website.

In London in the 16th and 17th centuries basically the levels of society were commoners, gentleman, knights, baronet, baron, viscount, earl (count), duke, prince, and king or queen. The main focus here is the titles of Knight and above. We will first discuss what the titles represent and then look at a few of the title holders from London between 1600-1700.

Gentleman – A Gentleman was a distinguished man that received his income from property, that was inherited or from another source.  Otherwise they were wealthy and did not need to work.   They could not claim nobility of any kind including the rank of an Esquire.

Esquire – An Esquire was originally called a Squire.  They were the assistant to a Knight (someone who held a shield), or the eldest son of a Knight.

Knight– A knight was given the honour in recognition of merit or service. Knights are allowed to use Sir in front of their name.  During the Middle Ages a Knight was a mounted soldier in armour that fought for the Crown.

Baronet / Baronetess–  A baronet is given to a commoner, and unique in nature.  It can be passed down as a hereditary honor but they are not allowed to a have a seat in Parliament.  It is also not considered an order of knighthood but it does rank above Knights. The only knightly orders it does not is the Order of the Garter and the Order of the Thistle.   This title was created by James I of England as a means of raising funds.  The female title of this rank is a baronetess but it is very rare as there have only ever been four in history.

Baron / Baroness–  This title was granted directly from the King or Queen, usually for their loyalty to the crown.  Originally anyone who was given land by the King / Queen for military service was considered a Baron no matter what their other title may have been.  This rank was discontinued in England when King Edward I recognized the dangers it posed to the monarchy structurally and financially.

Viscount / Viscountess– Viscounts in history were originally what was considered a Sheriff and was appointed by the ruling monarch of the kingdom. Although today this title is very much hereditary and is given to an heir of a Marquess or Count.  Their responsibility was for an area known as a viscounty, viscountship or viscountcy which was their jurisdiction to watch over and enforce the kingdom’s laws.

Earl (Count) / Countess– An Earl or County was a honorary title given by the monarch for services to the King / Queen, it could also be given to someone with no estate.  The Counts / Earls that were given lands by the monarch were given a small area of the kingdom called a county or countship.  This was not a hereditary title but the Earl/Counts with larger estates could occasionally pass the land to their son’s.

Marquess / Marchioness – A Marquess was the ruler over land called a mark or march.  They were responsible for the defense of any border lands of the kingdom and usually had more men that they commanded at arms than other nobles.

Duke / Duchess – A Duke is usually a relative of a King’s or Queen’s family. Their lands are called a duchy. They hold some responsibilities within the kingdom.

Prince / princess – A Prince is usually a son or member of the King’s or Queen’s family.  It is a title that is hereditary and is given to Europe’s highest nobility.

King / queen – A King / Queen is the second highest title within the sovereign nations and the only title that ever out ranks them is the Emperor. They are the head of state and rule over an entire kingdom or realm.

Now that we have a bit of history on the ranks within the kingdom we can understand the ability to hold a Coat of Arms / Crest within that kingdom.  In the following lists of the Knighthood it can be seen that they came from all walks of life and that it was an honor that was bestowed upon them for service to the crown.  The Coat of Arms / Crest was given to a particular person and there were variations of that Coat of Arms / Crest when the titles were passed down through hereditary means.  To make this a bit more clear, the King has a Coat of Arms his son the Prince has a similar Coat of Arms but it has differences within that Coat of Arms / Crest. This is so that the shield of the King and the Prince are distinguishable among one another within battle.  More information on the Coat of Arms / Crests / Genealogies for any particular surname can be found at  Below you will find four arms holders from London in the 16th and 17th centuries along with their arms information:

BARTHOLOMEW GRACEDIEU– 1697, Nov. (Oct.) 17.

BARTHOLOMEW GRACEDIEU, of London, salter, sheriff of London.  He was the 3rd son of Thomas Gracedieu of St. Botolph Bishopsgate, he married Frances and had two daughters. One of them died without having children.  He was knighted by the King on November 17, 1697 when he presented the London Address on the Peace, at Kensington.  He started an apprenticeship with Thomas Collet who was a salter and a member of the Vinters’ Company.  His father died in 1679 and he and his brother Daniel inherited London property. At this time he became a freeman. Starting in 1686 he was trading with Jamaica, and he was counsel for Jamaica after the Revolution to remit funds to London and eventually became an agent for the colony around 1693.   He died in 1715.

Grantee Information:

BARTHOLOMEW GRACEDIEU of London, salter, sheriff of London, born 1697, son of Thomas Gracedieu of St. Botolph Bishopsgate (possibly: Ar. a fesse dovetailed in base gu. betw. three torteaux.)


EDMUND HARRISON, of London, merchant, a director of the New East India Company  – Joseph Brooksbank, of Healaugh, born 1725 ; married to Elizabeth, daughter and co-heiress of Benjamin Bond, of London, and died 1759.  His widow married William Snell, a Director of the Bank of England, and of Hon. East India Company, son of William Snell, by his wife Cecilia,  daughter and co-heiress of Sir Edmund Harrison, Knight by his wife Mary Fiennes, niece of Viscount Saye and Sele. Mr. Brooksbank left (with a daughter Catherine, to. Thomas Page, of Poynters, Surrey) an only surviving son.

Grantee Information:

EDMUND HARRISON of London, merchant, director of the New East India Company, born 1698 (possibly: Gu. an eagle displ. and chief or. Crest—A snake vert entwined round a broken column or)

OWEN BUCKINGHAM was born approx. 1649 the son of George Buckingham an innkeeper of Stanwell, Middlesex. He was an English merchant, alderman, MP, Lord Mayor of London and Sheriff of London.  He was knighted in 1695, Oct. 14, upon congratulating the King on his safe return and success.  By the time he was 40 he had become involved in politics and was a common councilman for London and then became an Alderman from 1696 to his death. He was appointed the Sheriff of London for 1695-96, was knighted the same year and elected the Lord Mayor of London for 1704-05.. From a promise to manufacture sailcloth in the town that he was elected MP for reading in 1698 and then again in 1701, 1702, and 1705.  He only resigned his seat in favor of his son, Owen Buckingham.

He was married 6 times and became quite wealthy and was able to purchase the Fettiplace family estates near Reagin in 1706.  He died in 1713 and was survived by his only son and heir Owen and two daughters from his first marriage.

Grantee Information:

OWEN BUCKINGHAM – born 1649, son of George, Lord Mayor of London

(possibly: Or, a lion ramp. gu. debruised by a bend az. charged with three bezants. Crest—A lion ramp. gu.)

HENRY FURNESE– Henry Furnese was born May 30, 1658 the son of Henry Furnese of Sandwich Kent and pursued a career in the City of London as a merchant trader.  He was a member of Draper’s Company and was knighted on October 21, 1691 at the Hague, on a Sunday for carrying the news of the defeat of the Irish at Limerick.  He was one of the original directors of the Bank of England when the bank was founded in 1694.  He was also a director of the New East India Company from 1698 to 1703.  He was a Member of Parliament for Bramber in 1698 and was expelled on February 14, 1700.  Then re-elected for Sandwich in 1701 but was again expelled the following month, only to be re-elected again, after which he held the seat until his death.  He was the Sheriff of London 1700-01, and was created a baronet on 27 June 1707.  In 1711 he was selected an Alderman for the City of London. He was married twice first to Anne Brough in 1684 who was the daughter of linen draper Robert Brough of St. Lawrence Jewry.  He was married second to Matilda who was the daughter of fellow London merchant Sir Thomas Vernon.  He died November 30, 1712 and was succeeded by his son Robert.

Grantee Information:

HENRY FURNESE – born 1658, son of Henry, knighted 1691, member of Draper’s Company

(possibly: Ar. a talbot sejant sa. a border of the last)

David Evans, Baptist minister, and the Roe family

The other day I shared some new information about links between my Roe ancestors and the Evans family. My fellow researcher and distant relative Keith Roe has discovered that Rev. David Evans, who was the Baptist minister of Biggleswade in the late eighteenth century, was married to Mary Moss. She seems to have been the sister of Martha Moss, the wife of William Roe of Pirton, Hertfordshire, and indeed Mary Evans seems to have lived in Pirton after her husband’s death in 1786.

There is reason to believe that William Roe of Pirton may have been related in some way to my 3rd great grandfather Daniel Roe, a Baptist shoemaker in Biggleswade. There is also a connection of some kind between Daniel’s wife Eliza Holdsworth, my 3rd great grandmother, and the Evans family. Her mother was Lydia Evans and her grandfather Francis Evans, though little is known as yet about their origins. When Daniel and Eliza were married at Blunham in 1825, one of the two witnesses was Mary Evans, and there is reason to believe that she was the daughter of Biggleswade maltster and Baptist lay preacher Caleb Evans. Daniel and Eliza would name one of their sons Caleb.

A Baptist meeting

What do we know about Rev. David Evans and his wife Mary? From Baptist sources, we know that David was born in Mydffai, Camarthenshire, Wales. He he was said to be 76 years old when he died in 1786, meaning that he was born in about 1710. He was baptised as an adult in 1734 and began preaching in 1736. His first posting was in Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, after which he went to Ireland, and thence to Newport Pagnell. Some sources give his next and final posting as Biggleswade, while others mention an intermediary posting in nearby Maulden, and others a move in 1749 to Great Gransden in Huntingdonshire, where he was said to be ‘a very acceptable minister’.

All sources agree that it was in 1751 that Evans was appointed as minister of the Baptist congregation in Biggleswade. According to Keith Roe’s research, it was on 15th October 1751 that David Evans married Mary Moss in Potton, a few miles to the north of Biggleswade. David would have been about forty years old, but Mary was not quite nineteen, having been born in 1732, the daughter of Peter Moss and his wife Mary Ingoldsby. She had a brother Thomas who would marry Mary Daly in Ickleford, Hertfordshire, in 1761, and her sister Martha would marry William Roe at Arlesey, Bedfordshire, in 1767. We don’t know whether David and Mary Evans had any children – certainly none are mentioned in Mary’s will of 1806 – or whether there was any connection to Caleb Evans of Biggleswade, who was born in about 1780 and died in 1842.

John Geard

Perhaps the most memorable event to occur during David Evans’ ministry at Biggleswade was the great fire that destroyed the Baptist meeting house, as well as a number of other properties in the town. John Geard, the minister of Tilehouse Baptist church in Hitchin, and a friend of the Evans family, records the event in his memoirs (Windmill Hill, from which he viewed the fire, remains a focal point and a popular meeting place in the town to this day):

June the 16th, I was alarmed with the report of a terrible fire at Biggleswade.

I went upon the Windmill hill near Hitchin and from thence could see columns of smoke ascend up like clouds, though the fire was eleven miles off.  

On the 20th, I went to Biggleswade, and saw somewhat of the dreadful effects of this fire. It was an awful sight indeed. There were more than one hundred dwelling houses quite destroyed, and about twenty more that were destroyed, to a greater or less degree.  

There were seventy-nine poor families who were quite burned out. Several maltings were destroyed, and the Dissenting Meeting house, in which I had repeatedly preached, and in which good old Mr. David Evans had preached for many years, was quite destroyed. There was not anything belonging to the Meeting House …but was burned. There were few, if any persons of property, in the town but what were affected by this calamity, more or less, though some were affected much more than others. Mr. Herbert, merchant, was deeply affected, as to loss of property of different kinds. Mr. Foster suffered considerably, but he suffered but little compared with Mr. Herbert, and compared with what he was in imminent danger of suffering. Yet there was mercy mingled along with affliction, in this case. I do not recollect that there was any life lost, whereas there was one, if no more lost at the Potton fire in 1783.

John Geard’s memoir also mentions David Evans’ death and funeral, which occurred in the following year:

February the 7th [1786]. On this day, I went to Biggleswade, and attended the funeral of good old Mr. David Evans. He was arrested, January the 27th, with a paralytic stroke, and died February the 2nd aged 76 years. He was this day buried in the meeting house, and great respect was shown him at his funeral. By his own desire, Mr. Mayle of Blunham preached his funeral sermon, from 2 Cor. 1:12 “For our rejoicing in this, the testimony of our conscience, that in simplicity and godly sincerity, not with fleshly wisdom, but by the grace of God, we have had our conversation in the world, and more abundantly to you-wards”. There was a great number of people attended his funeral. It was calculated the number amounted to 800. Mr. Bowers, who then preached at Biggleswade, prayed before the sermon. He was not put into the grave till after the sermon, and I then spake over the grave.

Geard goes on to pay tribute to his fellow minister:

Mr. Evans had not been capable of preaching for some time before his death. He had lived at Biggleswade more than 30 years. He had labored under great discouragements there, as to apparent non-success. He once told Mr. Foster Senr. of Cambridge, when he went to supply Mr. Robinson’s congregation there, that he did not know that he had been instrumental for the conversion of one soul by all his preaching at Biggleswade. If he did not know of any such circumstance either at that time, or afterwards, I came to the knowledge of such a circumstance, after he was dead, in conversing with a man, who, I hope was a truly serious character and who attributed his first serious impression to a sermon that he heard at Biggleswade, and, I understood, preached by Mr. Evans, to whom he never made himself known. His general character and conduct, however, were highly exemplary. The celebrated Mr. George Whitefield, with all his popularity and success, did not leave behind him a more respectable character than good old Mr. Evans did, with all his apparent comparative want of ministerial success.

Though he was but little attended on, in the exercise of his ministry, he was highly esteemed by the town and neighbourhood in general. When he walked in the street, the very children were emulous to show, in their way, their respect for his character. Mr. Kirkby, one of his congregation, once related to me a peculiar anecdote, which bespoke the high estimation in which the general character of Mr. Evans was held. Mr. Kirkby, soon after he was settled in the neighbourhood of Biggleswade, as a farmer, to which he had removed out of Leicestershire, was at public dinner at Baldock, I presume, at one of the fairs held there. Somehow or other, the conversation at table took a turn, that led one of the company to speak about Biggleswade, who knew nothing of Mr. Kirkby, nor that he had anything to do with Biggleswade, much less that he had any connection with Mr. Evans, and whom perhaps, somebody or other of Biggleswade, had some way or other lately displeased. He spake about Biggleswade, somewhat to the following purport. “Biggleswade is a comical sort of place. I do not know that there is above one honest man there. I do believe there is one. The old Presbyterian parson is, I believe, an honest man. I do not know that there is any other there.” Now, though, I trust the man was far enough from being right in his opinion, relative to other people, yet what he said bore an exceedingly honorable testimony to the character of Mr. Evans, whom, it appeared, he meant, by the old Presbyterian parson, and this coming from one who was far enough, I presume, from being a Presbyterian himself, and who, perhaps, knew nothing or next to nothing of Mr. Evans, except what he had derived from general report concerning him, spoke so much the more forcibly in honor of Mr. Evans.

The 1806 will of Mary Evans (via Hertfordshire Archives and Library Services)

As yet, I’ve been unable to trace David Evans’ will. However, his wife Mary composed hers on 22nd March 1806 and a transcription can be found on the excellent website of the Pirton Local History Group. The principal beneficiaries are Mary’s sister Martha Roe and her nieces Mary and Ruth Odell, the daughters of Martha’s daughter Ruth, the wife of George Odell; Ruth had died in 1804. The witnesses to the will are John Geard, his wife Elizabeth and son John junior. Mary Evans also leaves a sum in trust to John Foster, a Biggleswade merchant (perhaps the person mentioned in John Geard’s memoir), and William Foster, a brewer in St Neots:

And I direct that the interest and dividends thereof be paid to the Minister for the time being of the congregation of  protestant dissenters of Bigleswade aforesaid called Baptists for and in consideration that he shall on the sixteenth day of June in every year preach a sermon in commemoration of the dreadful fire which happened at Bigleswade aforesaid on that day in the year one thousand seven hundred and eighty five.

Confirming connections to the Roe family

The new information that I shared in the last post – about the origins of the Roe family, and their possible connection with Hitchin, where we now live – has made me want to make absolutely sure that I’m descended from this family. I took an Ancestry DNA test some time ago, but to date I’ve been disappointed by the small number of matches with people in this branch of my family tree. So today I went back to the records, in an effort to confirm that I’m on the right track when it comes to the Roes.

My grandparents George John Londors and Minnie Louisa Roe on their wedding day

As mentioned before, I’m descended from the Roe family via my mother. She was born Joyce Alma Londors on 27thJuly 1933 in East Ham, which was then in Essex and is now part of the London borough of Newham. The England and Wales Birth Index gives her mother’s – my grandmother’s – name as Roe. My grandparents were married at St Alban’s church, Upton Park, on 2ndAugust 1925. My grandfather, George John Londors, then aged 28, was described as a labourer, the son of another George Londors, a grave digger. My grandmother – my ‘Nan’ – was then aged 23 and working as a machinist. The marriage record states that she was the daughter of Joseph Priestley Roe, a sewerman.

The 1939 England and Wales Register, which was recently made available online, has the Londors family living at 24 Oakfield Road, East Ham (the house where my Nan would spend the rest of her life). George J Londors, born on 14thDecember 1896, is now described as a ‘grave digger – heavy work’ and his wife Minnie L Londors, born on 20thApril 1902, as undertaking ‘unpaid domestic duties’.  At the same address are Joseph P Roe, born on 22ndJune 1862, and described as a ‘sewerman – retired’, and Eliza Roe, born on 29thAugust 1863, also undertaking ‘unpaid domestic duties’: they were my great grandparents.

My great grandparents Eliza Bailey and Joseph Priestley Roe (undated)

Minnie Louisa Roe was born in 1902 at 85 Oakfield Road, East Ham, the daughter of Joseph Roe, a general labourer, and his wife Eliza Roe, née Bailey. At the time of the 1911 census, Minnie, then aged eight, was living at 92 Oakfield Road, East Ham, where she was described as the daughter of general labourer Joseph Roe, aged 48, and Eliza Roe, 47, together with her older siblings Richard, Flora, Elizabeth, William and John. Her father Joseph is said to have been born in the ‘parish of St James, W’ (Westminster?). Since the census was taken in April 1911, his age is consistent with him having been born in June 1862.

The same family can be found living at 313 Barking Road, East Ham, in 1901, a year before Minnie’s birth. There is enough overlap in the children’s names as well as their dates of birth, to enable us to conclude that this is the same family. Joseph’s full name – Joseph Priestley Roe – is also given, and his age is said to be 38. His place of birth is given as ‘England, place not known’: perhaps he was not at home when the enumerator called? Ellis – the middle name of Joseph and Eliza’s son Walter – is a clue as to Joseph’s family origins: it was also the middle name of the man I believe to have been Joseph’s brother, Daniel Ellis Roe. (I’ve written before about the close, and somewhat mysterious links, between the Roe, Blanch and Ellis families.) In 1891 Joseph Roe and his family had been living at Denmark Terrace, East Ham, next door to Eliza’s parents, William and Elizabeth Bailey. Joseph, a dock labourer, was said to be twenty-nine years old and born in ‘London St James’, thus confirming a connection with the Joseph of the 1911 census.

St Anne’s church, Limehouse

Joseph Priestley Roe married Eliza Bailey at the church of St Anne, Limehouse, on 25thNovember 1883. Joseph, then working as a carman, is described in the parish register as the son of Daniel Roe, a shoemaker. One of the witnesses was Flora Blanch, another clue as to Joseph’s family origins: if my theory is correct, Joseph’s mother was Mary Ann Roe, née Blanch, and Flora was almost certainly Joseph’s cousin of that name.

If we look for records of Joseph before his marriage, we find a census record in 1881 for nineteen-year-old Joseph Roe, a butcher’s assistant  born in ‘Middlesex, Westminster’, living at 3 Grange Road, West Ham, and described as the nephew (and presumably employee) of butcher Walter Trader and his wife Emma. The couple had been married at St Anne’s church, Limehouse in 1869. We know from their marriage record that Emma Louise Trader, née Blanch, was the daughter of shoemaker John Blanch, who was also the father of the Mary Ann Roe, née Blanch, who I believe to have been Joseph Roe’s mother; in fact, Mary Ann was one of the witnesses to the marriage.

Searching for Joseph at the time of the 1871 census, we find the most likely candidate in eight-year-old ‘scholar’ Joseph Roe, to be found living with another uncle and aunt in Albany Road, Camberwell. He is said to have been born in ‘Middlesex, Haymarket’. His uncle is Thomas Parker and his aunt is Eliza Parker, née Roe; the couple had been married in 1853. Eliza was the sister of Daniel Roe, who I believe to have been Joseph’s father. Crucially, the 1871 census record notes that Eliza was born in Biggleswade, Bedfordshire, in about 1831: the first evidence we have of Joseph Roe’s connection to the Roe family of that town.

The final link in the chain connecting my great grandfather Joseph to this branch of the Roe family is provided by the official record of his birth, which took place at 23 Great Windmill Street, in the sub-district of Berwick Street, in the registration district of St James, Westminster. His mother is said to be Mary Ann Roe, ‘formerly Blanch’, while his father, who was responsible for registering the birth, was Daniel Roe, a ‘bootmaker master’. The only disparity is in the date of Joseph’s birth, which is given here as 27thJuly 1862, whereas later records claim that he was born on 22nd June in that year. Perhaps this can be explained by the fact that Joseph’s mother, and probably his father, died when he was very young, and that he was brought up, as we have seen, by various aunts and uncles, who may not have had access to his birth records. Interestingly, Joseph wasn’t christened until 6thJuly 1870, at St Luke’s, a chapel of ease within the parish of St James, Westminster.

Eliza Roe née Holdsworth, the wife of Daniel Roe senior, in old age

There is plenty of evidence to confirm that Joseph Priestley Roe’s father – my great great grandfather – Daniel Roe, was the son of Biggleswade Baptist shoemaker Daniel Roe senior and his wife Eliza Roe, née Holdsworth. As I noted in the last post, when Eliza returned to London with her children in the 1840s, after her husband Daniel’s death, her son Daniel junior married Mary Ann Blanch, who was actually his second cousin. Mary Ann’s mother Keziah Blanch, née Holdsworth, was the first cousin of Daniel’s mother Eliza. In fact, I have reason to believe that Daniel may have been apprenticed to his future father-in-law, shoemaker John Blanch. Joseph’s mother Mary Ann Roe, née Blanch, would die of consumption in 1870, and since we have no further records for his father Daniel after that date, we must assume that he probably died around the same time.

Now that I’ve convinced myself of the connection between my immediate Roe forebears and the Baptist Roes of Biggleswade, I can return with confidence to exploring the origins of the family.

New information about the history of the Roe family

When we moved to Hitchin twenty years ago I had no idea that there was an ancestral connection to the area. It was a revelation to discover that a branch of my mother’s family that I’d always associated with the East End of London – the Roes – had once lived in places like Biggleswade and Barkway, a dozen or so miles from here. Now, new information provided by Keith Roe, a fellow researcher and distant relative, has uncovered evidence that some of my forebears may have lived even closer to where I’m writing this – in Hitchin itself.

First, a reminder of my what we already know about the Roe family. My maternal grandmother – my ‘Nan’ – was born Minnie Louisa Roe in East Ham, London, in 1902. She was the daughter of labourer Joseph Priestley Roe and his wife Eliza Bailey. Joseph had been born in Great Windmill Street, Soho, in 1862, the son of shoemaker Daniel Roe and Mary Ann Blanch. Daniel was born in Biggleswade, Bedfordshire, in 1829. His father was another Daniel Roe, also a shoemaker, and his mother was Eliza Holdsworth: they were married in nearby Blunham in 1825.


Nineteenth-century map of Hertfordshire (click on image to enlarge)

Born in 1801, Eliza Holdsworth was the daughter of Whitechapel shoemaker William Holdsworth. We know a good deal about the Holdsworths and their origins: William was the son of Yorkshire-born farmer Joseph Holdsworth and his wife Elizabeth Gibson, who was descended from the Greene family of Stepney and the Bynes of Sussex, all of whom I’ve written about extensively on this and other blogs. But until now we’ve known very little about the origins of Eliza’s husband, Daniel Roe senior. We knew that he was a Baptist, like Eliza’s parents, and that there was a possible connection with Martha and Elizabeth Roe who lived in the village of Barkway, in the northeastern corner of Hertfordshire. But as to when and where Daniel was born, or who his parents were: until now, we’ve only been able to speculate.

Daniel Roe and Eliza Holdsworth had five children together, before Daniel’s death in 1838. Their daughter Anna Maria died young, and Eliza and her other children all left Biggleswade in the early 1840s. One son, Richard, was apprenticed as a carpenter in Layston, not far from Barkway; he married a local girl and they eventually emigrated to Australia. The other three Roe children – Daniel junior, Caleb and Eliza junior – would all eventually move to the East End of London, where their mother had been born. Eliza also returned to London, but only briefly. In 1845 she married for a second time, to John Sharp, a carpenter from Barkway, where she returned with him.

The Roes of Barkway

Like Eliza, John Sharp had recently been widowed. His first wife was Martha Roe, whom he had married in Barkway in 1821; they had a daughter, Elizabeth, who died at the age of two. John and Martha can be found in the 1841 census living in Barkway High Street. The records state that Martha died of consumption on 24th May 1845.


Old photograph of Barkway, Hertfordshire

It seems likely that Martha was a close relative of Eliza’s late husband, Daniel – perhaps his sister, or maybe a cousin?  Perhaps the marriage between John and Eliza was simply a way of John providing social and economic security for his widowed sister-in-law. Eliza would spend the remainder of her life working as a domestic servant for various families in villages along the borders of Hertfordshire, Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire.

It would seem logical that if the Martha Roe who married John Sharp was related to Daniel Roe senior, then so was the Elizabeth Roe who in 1815 had married James King, also in Barkway, particularly as James was a witness to Martha’s marriage to John Sharp in 1821. Perhaps she was Martha’s sister? James and Elizabeth King would have three children together – Richard in 1816, Henry John in 1824 and Elizabeth Kimpton in 1826 – before James’ early death in the same year. In 1837 Elizabeth King, née Roe, married for a second time, also in Barkway, to farm labourer Lot Watson, who had also been married before.

The Luton connection

The record of Elizabeth’s marriage to Lot Watson gives her father’s name as John Roe. Previously, it was thought that this was the man who married Hannah Role in Layston in 1795, but the new evidence uncovered by Keith Roe has opened up other possibilities. Keith has followed Elizabeth Kimpton King –  Elizabeth Watson née Roe’s daughter from her first marriage – through the records, and found that she married a man named George Hale, at St Mary’s church, Luton, in 1846. The 1851 census finds them living at 26 Park Lane, Luton, with their three-year-old daughter Martha and three-month-old son Henry. George, who was born in St Albans, worked as a shoemaker and Elizabeth as a straw bonnet sewer. The record clearly states that Elizabeth was born in Barkway, Hertfordshire, in 1827 or thereabouts.

st mary's luton 1805

St Mary’s church, Luton in 1805

Further confirmation that this is the right person is provided by the fact that 33 Park Lane, just a few doors away from the Hales’ home, is occupied by one Elizabeth King, a widow of 61, also a straw bonnet sewer, who is almost certainly Elizabeth’s mother. In 1861 both the Hales and Elizabeth King are still living in the same street. By 1871, Elizabeth Hale is a widow and living with her children in Elizabeth Street, Luton. Elizabeth’s mother, now using her later married name of Watson, is living with them. She seems to have died in 1875; her daughter Elizabeth Hale, née King, would live until 1899.

Interestingly, the census records for Elizabeth Watson, formerly King, née Roe, describe her as having been born in Luton. This led Keith Roe, in his quest for Elizabeth and Martha Roe’s origins, to search for a John Roe who either had been born or had lived in Luton. As I’ve found before, there were a number of Roe families in Luton and the surrounding villages at this time, but Keith has come across a likely candidate in a John Roe who was active in the town between 1819 and 1832, when land tax records show him to have been a tenant of one James Rushmore, who is listed as a master cordwainer in the Luton Apprentice Indentures.


St Mary’s church, Hitchin (via Wikipedia)

This is where, for me, the story gets really interesting. Keith has found a shoemaker named John Row (sic) apprenticed to John Morgan, a cordwainer of Hitchin, as at 8thNovember 1785. He is almost certainly the John Roe, cordwainer, who would marry Mary Morrell at St Mary’s church, Hitchin, on 28thAugust 1788. Mary died only a year later, perhaps in childbirth – she was only 18 at the time – and was buried at Back Street Independent Chapel in Hitchin. On 1stNovember 1792 John Roe, a widower, married Elizabeth Rosendale or Rossindale, also at St. Mary’s in Hitchin. Elizabeth was from Royston and seems to have been the daughter of James Rosendale and his wife Elizabeth Wheatley. Confirmation that this is the same John Roe who would live and work in Luton in the 1820s can be found in the name of one of the witnesses to this second marriage: James Rushmore, who would be John’s landlord – and perhaps his employer? – in Luton.

Back Street Independent Chapel Hitchin

Back Street Independent Chapel, Hitchin

Keith has found possible burial records for John and Elizabeth Roe in Luton. Elizabeth, who was said to have been born in 1770, died in 1833. John, born in 1763, died in 1836. Unfortunately, it has not yet proved possible to find birth or baptismal records for any children born to John and Elizabeth. However, given that they were married in 1792, it seems plausible that they could be the parents of the Elizabeth Roe who married first James King and then Lot Watson in Barkway – given that we know she was born in Luton, probably in 1793. Might she have been named after her mother?

As for the Martha Roe who married John Sharp, also in Barkway, might she also be a daughter of John and Elizabeth Roe of Luton, who perhaps went to Barkway with her sister Elizabeth in search of work, and like her ended up marrying a local man? And could Martha’s name provide some kind of confirmation of the next link in the chain – the identity of John Roe’s parents?

The Roe family of Pirton and the Biggleswade connection

Keith Roe has discovered a Roe family living in and around Pirton, a village a few miles to the north of Hitchin, at around this time. Not only is there a good chance that they are related to the Roes of Luton, but they have a definite connection with Biggleswade and the Baptist community there. Thanks to the excellent Pirton local history website, we know a good deal about the family of William and Martha Roe who lived in the village in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Piecing together information from wills and parish records, we can determine that William Roe was probably born in the 1720s. He was married twice, firstly in 1747 to Ann Hanscombe in Ickleford, Hitchin, and secondly, following Ann’s death in 1766, to Martha Moss, in Arlesey, just across the county border in Bedfordshire.

According to Keith’s research, Martha was the daughter of Peter Moss and his wife Mary Ingoldsby. They had another daughter, Mary, born in Sutton, Bedfordshire, in 1732, and this is where the connection to the Baptists of Biggleswade comes in. On 15thOctober 1751, in Potton, Mary Moss married Reverend David Evans. Born in Mydffai, Camarthenshire, David had previously been a Baptist minister in Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, and took up his post in Biggleswade in the same year that he married Mary. After his death in 1786, it would seem that his widow Mary went to live with her sister Martha in Pirton: that was where she made her will in 1806.

Biggleswade Old Town Hall

William and Martha Roe had three children that we know of from Martha’s will of 1817, from which we also know that William had predeceased her. There were two sons, John and Daniel, and a daughter Ruth. She had married George Odell in 1792, had two daughters – Mary in 1800 and Martha in 1804 – and then died, probably in the process of giving birth to the latter. Unfortunately we don’t have birth records for John, Daniel and Ruth – perhaps because the family were Dissenters. Both Martha’s will and that of her sister Mary Evans mention John Geard, minister of Tilehouse Street Baptist Church in Hitchin, whose extensive memoir (which can be accessed online) makes repeated reference to Rev. David Evans.

Why is the connection to David Evans and the Biggleswade Baptists important? Because it may help to explain how my 3rdgreat grandmother Eliza Holdsworth found her way from Whitechapel to Bedfordshire, and how she came to marry Daniel Roe. We know that Eliza’s mother’s surname was Evans. Her father William Holdsworth married Lydia Evans in London in 1792, and that she was the daughter of Francis and Elizabeth Evans. We also know that, when Eliza married Daniel Roe in Blunham in 1825, the witnesses were Mary Evans and William Bowtell. Mary may have been one of the daughters of Caleb Evans, a Biggleswade malt-maker who was also a part-time Baptist preacher. His other daughter Martha (you can see a certain naming pattern emerging here) married a James Bowtell in 1826. In 1841, the widowed Eliza Roe, née Holdsworth, and her children would be living just a few streets away from the Evans and Bowtell families.

Caleb Evans’ wife Ann was a Marsom by birth, born in Potton in 1771, and from a long-established Bedfordshire Baptist family, one of whose members, Thomas Marsom, had founded the first Baptist church in Luton, and who had been imprisoned with John Bunyan, at which time he is said to have persuaded the latter to publish the book that would become Pilgrim’s Progress. To date, I haven’t been able to establish any definite connection either between Caleb Evans and Rev. David Evans (might he have been his son?), or between either of them and the Francis Evans whose daughter Lydia married William Holdsworth. However, it seems likely that Eliza initially came to Bedfordshire to stay with her father’s Evans relations, and that through them she met Daniel Roe, whose family was linked to Rev. David Evans through his marriage to Mary Moss.

This makes it likely that there is some kind of connection between my ancestor Daniel Roe and the Roes of Pirton. We know that William and Martha Roe of Pirton had sons named John and Daniel. Might their son John have been the Luton shoemaker who married Elizabeth Rosendale and had daughters Elizabeth and Martha (named after her Pirton grandmother?) who moved to Barkway? And might their other son Daniel be the Biggleswade shoemaker who married Eliza Holdsworth? Or is it more likely, as Keith Roe speculates, that ‘our’ Daniel was actually the grandson, rather than the son of William and Martha Roe of Pirton – which would mean that either John Roe of Luton or his brother Daniel could be my 4thgreat grandfather?

Is it also possible that the Roe families that I previously found living in Luton later in the 19thcentury were related to the Roes of Pirton? William and Peter Roe were both shoemakers. William’s children included sons named John, Daniel and William, while Peter also had a son named Daniel. William was said to be born in about 1811 and Peter in 1801. Could they be sons of the John or Daniel Roe, who were the sons of William and Martha of Pirton? The coincidence of Christian names, and of occupations, would certainly seem to point in that direction.

Keith Roe’s diligent research has certainly opened up some exciting new lines of enquiry, and I’m grateful to him for sharing his findings with me. Incidentally, Keith is the son of Ron Roe, to whose pioneering research those of us working on the history of these families all owe a huge debt.

The Nonconformist burial of Master Michael Bonner

Yesterday I wrote about my discovery of new information about John William Bonner (1762 – 1817), the London merchant and official of the Royal Ordnance Office, who was the nephew of my 5thgreat grandmother Elizabeth Holdsworth née Gibson (1733 – 1809). I’ve also discovered another record relating to the Bonner family, one that throws fresh light on their religious affiliation, and perhaps that of my ancestors more generally.

As I noted in yesterday’s post, John William was one of the two sons of Captain Michael Bonner the elder (1733 – 1802) and Frances Gibson (1735 – 1802), the sister of my ancestor Elizabeth. The other son was Michael Bonner the younger, who would follow in his father’s footsteps and become a ship’s captain. Born in 1768 at Bird Street, Stepney, in 1792 Michael married Eleanor Trantum Sayle at the parish church of St Mary Magdalene, Bermondsey. They would have eight children together, before Michael’s death in 1811, at the age of 43.

Burial record for ‘Master Michael Bonner’

I knew that Michael and Eleanor had a son named Michael christened at the church of St Mary Rotherhithe on 8thJune 1800, but until know I had come across no further records for this child. I’ve now discovered, via Ancestry, a record of the death of ‘Master Michael Bonner…aged 2 years from Rotherhith’ on 17thJune 1802, and his burial on 24thof the same month. However, unlike the child’s baptism, this ceremony did not take place at the local parish church, but at the independent chapel at Collier’s Rents, White Street, in Southwark, in whose register this record appears.

This meeting house had been founded in 1695 and from 1791 its minister was James Knight, a graduate of the Dissenting Academy at Homerton. At that time the chapel was described as ‘a good square brick building with three large galleries, and a burial ground adjoining, of a considerable size’.  The chapel was close to the church of St George, Southwark, which was described as Eleanor’s home parish when she married Michael Bonner, so it’s tempting to suppose that the Nonconformist affiliation might have derived from her side of the family, though I’ve yet to find any other members of the Sayle family in the chapel’s register and Eleanor herself was christened at the parish church of St Saviour’s, Southwark.

Collier’s Rents, to the north of White Street, is clearly visible on this extract from Rocque’s map of 1746. The building marked ‘I.M.’ (Independent Meeting?) corresponds to the chapel.

The record from Collier’s Rents chapel is certainly the earliest evidence of Dissent from the Established Church that I’ve found in this branch of the family, since the records for the Gibson family, and before them the Greenes and the Bynes, are solidly Anglican, though in the case of the Bynes with an occasional Puritan bent. In 1763 my ancestor Elizabeth Gibson, the younger Michael Bonner’s aunt, married for a second time, to Yorkshire-born farmer Joseph Holdsworth (1735 – 1795), who was almost certainly from Dissenting stock, and evidence of Nonconformity would emerge in the lives of their children: most obviously in the Baptist affiliation of their son, my 4thgreat grandfather William Holdsworth (1771 – 1827).

John William Bonner in Holden’s Directory of 1802

Thanks to a new hint at Ancestry, I’ve discovered a useful new source: Holden’s Directory for 1802, which contains an alphabetical list, as its cover states, of ‘ninety and one hundred thousand names’ of London residents belonging to the ‘nobility and gentry’ of the city.

Holden's Directory cover

The original hint that led me to the directory related to John William Bonner, the nephew of my 5thgreat grandmother Elizabeth Holdsworth née Gibson. The directory finds Mr John William Bonner, who would have been 40 years old at the time, living at Marsham Street, Westminster. But the directory also lists three other men who share his surname: Captain Michael Bonner of 33 Paradise Street, Rotherhithe; Mr John Bonner of 9 Charlotte Row, Bermondsey; and Mr Charles Bonner of 17 Salisbury Square.

Bonners London directory

I confess that I don’t know who Charles Bonner was, or even whether he was a relative of John William’s (Salisbury Square is to the south of Fleet Street, near St Bride’s church.) But the other two men certainly were. The Captain Michael Bonner mentioned here is almost certainly John William’s younger brother, who spent most of his adult life in Rotherhithe; he would die at an address in Paradise Street in December 1811, nine years after this directory was compiled, at the age of 43. He shared his name, rank and profession of mariner with his and John William’s father, but the latter died at Charlotte Row, Bermondsey, very early in 1802, so he is unlikely to be the person referred to in the directory. As for the other John Bonner, who was also living at Charlotte Row in 1802, this is probably a reference to John William’s son, John Harker Bonner, who was born in Bermondsey and would have been 22 years old in 1802. Perhaps he was living with his grandparents at this time?

The information in Holden’s Directory sheds a little more light on our knowledge of John William Bonner’s life and career, and therefore indirectly on our general understanding of the lives of my late 18thand early 19thcentury ancestors. John was born in 1762 in Darby Street, off Rosemary Lane, in East Smithfield, London. His parents were, as noted above, Captain Michael Bonner the elder, a mariner, and Frances Gibson, who was one of the daughters of my 6thgreat grandparents John Gibson and his wife Mary Greene, and the younger sister of my 5thgreat grandmother Elizabeth Gibson.

By the time his younger brother Michael was born in 1768, the family had moved to Bird Street, in the parish of St George in the East, Stepney. In 1776, when he was 14 years old, John William Bonner was apprenticed to the curiously named (and probably German) merchant Other Winder of Lime Street, London. The next record we have for John William is for his marriage, on 22ndDecember 1781, to Sarah Ford, at St Mary’s, Whitechapel. John would have been 19 years old at the time. One of the witnesses to the wedding was his cousin Bowes John Gibson, an official with the East India Company, and the younger brother both of John William’s mother Frances and of my ancestor Elizabeth.

John-Oxley-Parker copy

Between 1782 and 1786, John William Bonner was paying land tax in Bermondsey, on a property whose landlord was John Oxley Parker (1742 – 1826), who was a land agent and Deputy Registrar to the archdeaconries of Essex, Middlesex and Colchester. The Bonners were living at Bermondsey Buildings when their sons John Harker and George were born, in 1782 and 1784 respectively. However, by the time their daughter Mary Ann was christened in 1793, they were living in Mile End Old Town and paying land tax on property owned by George Kemp.

We know that John William Bonner was apprenticed to a London merchant in 1776, and we know from his tombstone that he ended his life, in 1817, working for ‘His Majesty’s Ordnance Office’, which was housed in the Tower of London. But between those two dates we know little or nothing about his professional career. However, the revelation that he lived in Marsham Street, Westminster, in 1802, is perhaps helpful here. The testimony of Holden’s Directory is borne out by land tax records from the same and subsequent year, which also find Bonner in Marsham Street, which is just a short distance from the Houses of Parliament. The Bonners must have made the move from Mile End to Westminster shortly after Mary Ann’s birth, since by 1795 John William was paying land tax on a property in Park Street, Mayfair.

As well as suggesting growing prosperity, these moves may also indicate that John William Bonner was working for the government for at least two decades before his death. His surviving children (we hear nothing more of son George after his baptism) maintained their connections with the east of the city. John Harker Bonner and his wife  Mary Knight Christopher and their children lived in Mile End Old Town, while Mary Ann Bonner and her husband John Godfrey Schwartz occupied various addresses in Whitechapel, Limehouse and Bethnal Green before also ending their lives in Mile End Old Town. And of course John William Bonner himself chose to be buried in the churchyard of St Dunstan’s, Stepney, in the family tomb constructed by his great grandfather – and my 7thgreat grandfather – goldsmith Joseph Greene.

Mary Johnson alias Bodington: the mystery deepens

I wrote recently about my quest to discover the identity, and fate, of Mary Johnson, the heiress and apparent goddaughter of Ratcliffe apothecary John Bodington, who died in 1728. Bodington was a friend, associate and possible relative, of my 7thgreat grandfather, Ratcliffe-born London goldsmith Joseph Greene.

In that post, I reported my discovery of a lawsuit from 1734, involving a network of families in London and Stepney, in which a certain ‘Mary Johnson alias Bodington’ was one of the defendants. I’ve now taken delivery of the relevant documents from the National Archives and have spent a good deal of time over the past couple of weeks attempting to decipher them, and to understand the reason for Mary’s involvement in the case.

mary bodington case image 1

Judith Boyce’s legal ‘complaint’ from 1734

The suit was originally brought by Judith Boyce, and after her death taken over by her son John, a surgeon in Wapping. Judith was the sister and heiress of James Bundock, a London wine cooper who appears to have owned a number of properties in south Essex. The names of these places – Fobbing, Downham, Wickford, Horndon and Prittlewell – are familiar to me from my childhood years in nearby Chelmsford.

At some point in the 1680s Bundock had come to an arrangement concerning some of these properties with Richard Goodlad, and it was this arrangement, the details of which I’ve struggled to understand, which was at the root of the dispute between the Boyce family and the defendants. It seems that Goodlad treated the properties in Essex as his own, rather than as some kind of loan or temporary arrangement from Bundock, and passed them on to various members of his family, who in turn left them in their wills to other relatives or sold them on elsewhere. Judith Boyce, and later her son John, claimed that the properties, and the rents and proceeds from them, rightly belonged to them, as the heirs of James Bundock.

mucking map

Ordnance Survey map of 1805, showing Mucking and other places in the south of Essex mentioned in Judith Boyce’s complaint (via

Mary Johnson alias Bodington was listed among the defendants because, according to Judith Boyce’s original complaint, John Goodlad, one of Richard Goodlad’s descendants, sold some of the properties to a certain Josiah Kingsman, and further stated:

that John Bodington deceased late father of the said Mary Bodington afterwards purchased the same premises or some part of them from the said Josiah Kingsman and by his last will and testament devised or otherwise gave the same to the said Mary Bodington which said premises are now held by John Cole as tenant to the said Mary Bodington at the yearly rent of fifty pounds or at some such rent and the said Mary Bodington claims them as her inheritance and insists that they are not liable to redemption by your oratrix and refuse to discover at what rate or price the said Josiah Kingsman purchased them and for what sum he sold them to the said John Bodington.

When I first read this, I thought I’d been wasting my time on this lawsuit, since ‘my’ John Bodington describes Mary as his god daughter, not his daughter. Perhaps there was another John Bodington alive at this time with an actual daughter named Mary? But then I noticed that the properties in question were in Mucking, and I remembered that this village featured in the will of ‘my’ John Bodington, which refers to ‘all that my freehold messuage tenement or farme with the Outhousing buildings lands ground and hereditaments thereunto belonging with their and every of their appurtenances now in my owne possession situate lying and being at Mucking in the County of Essex’ and also to ‘all my Customary Copyhold lands tenements and hereditaments with their and every of their appurtenances now alsoe in my owne possession lying at Mucking aforesaid and held of the said Manor of Mucking by Copy of Court Roll’. These are among the properties whose ‘rents, issues and profits’ Bodington’s executors (who included my ancestor Joseph Greene) are to ‘pay and apply…for and towards the maintaining Educating and providing in a Gentile and handsome manner as I have hitherto done for my God daughter Miss Mary Johnson a young Gentlewoman.’

mary bodington case image 2

Disclaimer signed by Mary Johnson

Then there is the fact that, in a separate document (see above), in which she disclaims all rights to the properties mentioned in the Boyces’ lawsuit, Mary describes herself as ‘Mary Johnson in the complainants’ original bill called Mary Bodington…otherwise Johnson’ and clearly signs herself Mary Johnson, the name used by John Bodington in his will. So there is no doubt in my mind that this is the same person.

How are we to understand what is going on here? Was Mary Johnson the daughter, or goddaughter, of John Bodington? Why is she referred to one way in the latter’s will, and the other in the lawsuit? It seems odd that the complainants would confidently describe Mary as John Bodington’s daughter in a legal document if that were not the case, and one would imagine Mary herself correcting this description, if false, in her own disclaimer. But if Mary was actually Bodington’s daughter, why would he describe her differently in his own will which, after all, was also a legal document?

One possible explanation is that Mary was John Bodington’s natural daughter, but that for some reason he wanted to disguise this fact during his lifetime, by adopting her as his goddaughter. If she really were John’s daughter it would go some way towards explaining why he made her virtually his sole heir, and made extensive and careful provision both in his lifetime, and then in his will, for her welfare. Her surname – Johnson – may have been the name of her mother, possibly since deceased, or it may have been a random name chosen simply to disguise Mary’s parentage.

It’s frustrating that John Bodington’s will is so lacking in information about his family, save for a brief reference to his ‘cousin’ Mrs Bayley. I’ve found no evidence that Bodington was ever married, and his will certainly makes no reference to a wife or any children or descendants. Nor does he provide any information about Mary Johnson’s origins, except to state very clearly that she was born on ‘the twenty third day of October 1713’, though I’ve yet to find a christening record that aligns with this date.

I think my next step might be to see whether anyone of about Mary’s age, and bearing the surname Johnson or possibly Bodington, was married in the 1730s. At the time of the law suit of 1734, she was still a ‘spinster’ of twenty, and presumably still in the care of her guardians, the executors of her father’s – or godfather’s – will.

Were my ancestors Huguenots?

I’ve been reading Dan Cruikshank’s history of Spitalfields and have been fascinated by the stories of the different groups of people who sought refuge there, on the eastern edge of London: Catholics during the repression under Elizabeth I, the Irish in the eighteenth century, and of course the Huguenots. I was intrigued by the way that French Huguenot names recurred throughout the history of the area, and in the East End more generally. It stirred a faint memory in me, of a family history connection with Spitalfields. Wasn’t there something about one of my Londors ancestors possibly being married in Spitalfields? And what about that unusual surname: I’ve always imagined it was of German or Dutch origin – but what if it was French?

First, a quick recap on my connection to the Londors family. My mother was born Joyce Alma Londors in East Ham in 1933. Her father was George John Londors (1896 – 1961), a gardener at the City of London cemetery and the son of another George Londors (1863 – 1934), a gravedigger. He in turn was the son of John Schofield Londors (1827 – 1915), an agricultural labourer in Barkingside, and the eldest son of another farm worker, John Londors (1785 – 1876), by his second wife Mary Ann Schofield (1802 – 1887).


Christening record for John-Felix Landors or Londors, Woodford, Essex, 1785

According to census records, my 3rdgreat grandfather John Londors was born in Woodford, and I believe he is the John-Felix Landors, son of yet another John Landors or Londors and his wife Hannah, who was baptised there on 7thAugust 1785. There are good reasons for believing that his parents were the John Londors and Hannah Ackerly who were married at the church of Christ Church, Spitalfields, on 7thDecember 1782, despite the fact that in the parish register the spelling of John’s surname has been altered from Londors or Landors to Lundors, which is also how he signed his name, though it was spelt Londors in the record of the banns. It’s also my belief that this is the same John Londors who, nearly ten years later and by now a widower, married Sarah Reeves at the same church 8thApril 1792.

The fact that there are so few people with the surname Londors in the records gives credence to my theory that John Londors of Spitalfields and John Londors of Woodford were one and the same person. According to one online source, there are only 39 people in the world with the surname Londors, all but one of them in England. I’m fairly confident that they can all trace their descent from my 4thgreat grandfather, John Londors of Woodford.

Christ Church, Spitalfields

As for the Huguenot/French connection: is it significant that one of the witnesses at the first wedding was a certain John Rondeau? He is probably the man of that name who made his will in 1789, appointing his wife Margaret as executor. Was he a friend of John Londors, or perhaps his employer or landlord? Then there is the fact that, according to the Woodford parish register, John and Hannah Londors or Landors gave their son the name John-Felix: both the name Felix, and the hyphenation of the two Christian names, suggesting a possible French connection.

londors ackerly marriage 1792

Marriage of John Lundors or Londors in the parish register of Christ Church, Spitalfields, 1792

I’ve yet to find any trace of John Londors in Spitalfields before his first marriage, nor are there records of anyone else with the same exact surname. However, there are a number of individuals with similar surnames, such as Landors or Landers. For example, the land tax records for Spitalfields refer to a Dennis Landers in 1756 and a Henry Landers in 1759. A child named Elizabeth Landers, the daughter of George and Elizabeth, was baptised at Christ Church, Spitalfields, on 21stDecember 1766.

As for my ancestor John Londors, if he married for the first time in 1782, then perhaps he was born in about 1760. I haven’t found anyone with a similar name baptised in Spitalfields at that time, but there was a John Landers, son of David and Mary Landers, christened at All Hallows, Barking by the Tower, on 2ndMarch 1759/60, having been born on 21stFebruary in that year.